Tories express concern over Huawei role in UK 5G network

Letter from Iain Duncan Smith and other MPs requests that ‘high-risk’ vendors are ruled out

Aamna Mohdin


Sat 8 Feb 2020 10.32 GMTLast modified on Sat 8 Feb 2020 17.42 GMT


A group of senior Conservatives have written to their fellow Tory MPs expressing concern over the government’s decision to allow Chinese technology company Huawei to have a role in building the UK’s 5G network.

Iain Duncan Smith, who is among the signatories, said there was cross-party concern about the issue.

The letter, which was also signed by former ministers including Owen Paterson, David Davis and Damian Green, said some MPs were working to find a better solution to the 5G issue. The senior Tories want “high-risk” vendors to be ruled out immediately or phased out over time.

The letter states: “We are seeking to identify a means by which we ensure that only trusted vendors are allowed as primary contractors into our critical national infrastructure. Trusted vendors would be companies from countries that have fair market competition, rule of law, respect human rights, data privacy and non-coercive government agencies.”


Speaking on the BBC’s Today programme on Saturday, Duncan Smith said the UK risked isolating itself if it continued with plans to go forward with Huawei, adding that Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the US were all against the move.

He told the programme: “The foreign secretary said at the dispatch box that China is considered to be an aggressor in these matters, constantly attacking our systems alongside Russia. They claim Russia is an aggressor and they won’t have anything to do with Russian technology – then surely the same principle must apply to China.”

The UK government said it would allow Huawei to be involved in building peripheral parts of the 5G and full-fibre network, despite describing it as a high-risk vendor. It will also introduce a regulatory framework aimed at ensuring the Chinese company’s share of the 5G market cannot exceed 35% and can be reduced over time.

Guardian Today: the headlines, the analysis, the debate - sent direct to you

Read more

In response, Duncan Smith said: “I think therefore we need to get the government to look to get the involvement of Huawei not to 35% but to 0%.”

He said there was a lot of disquiet over the government plans. “There is real concern across the floor of the house,” he said.

“We’ve got no friends out there any longer on this issue. Australia I’m told had a go at the foreign secretary about this decision when he went out there, New Zealand is against it, Canada is against it, America is against it. The ‘Five Eyes’ are all against it.

“The truth is security and the protection of the UK is the absolute number one priority for any government.”

The intervention comes as the US vice-president, Mike Pence, indicated the decision by Boris Johnson to allow Huawei a limited role in 5G rollout could jeopardise a post-Brexit trade deal between Britain and the US.

Pence told the US broadcaster CNBC: “The United States is very disappointed that the United Kingdom has decided to go forward with Huawei. When I went at the president’s direction in September I met with prime minister Johnson and I told him the moment the UK was out of Brexit we were willing to begin to negotiate a free-trade arrangement with the UK.”

Asked whether the decision could prove a deal-breaker, he said: “We’ll see. But we just don’t believe that utilising the assets, the technology of Huawei is consistent with the security or privacy interests of the UK, of the United States, and it remains a real issue between our two countries.”

The remarks came after it was reported that Donald Trump blasted Johnson with “apoplectic” rage during a phone call regarding the 5G move.

We won’t let Brexit come between us…

… and we hope you feel the same. These are turbulent, decade-defining times, with so many crises that it can be demoralising. The climate emergency, nativism, the rise of the far right, poverty, tax avoidance, social injustice - the biggest problems in Europe are issues that transcend national borders. But we are a news organisation that transcends borders too. In order to understand these issues fully and find solutions, we need to view them as a whole. The Guardian's international, independent journalism seeks to join up the dots, to provide a comprehensive view.

More people, like you, are reading and supporting the Guardian’s independent, investigative journalism than ever before. And unlike many news organisations, we made the choice to keep our reporting open for all, regardless of where they live or what they can afford to pay.

The Guardian will engage with the most critical issues of our time – from the escalating climate emergency to widespread inequality to the influence of big tech on our lives. At a time when factual information is a necessity, we believe that each of us, around the world, deserves access to accurate reporting with integrity at its heart.

Our editorial independence means we set our own agenda and voice our own opinions. Guardian journalism is free from commercial and political bias and not influenced by billionaire owners or shareholders. This means we can give a voice to those less heard, explore where others turn away, and rigorously challenge those in power.